{"id":2241,"date":"2023-07-11T14:58:40","date_gmt":"2023-07-11T14:58:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/?p=37610"},"modified":"2023-07-11T14:58:40","modified_gmt":"2023-07-11T14:58:40","slug":"sad-najwyzszy-scj-stwierdza-ze-wartosc-dowodowa-przypisywana-fotokopiom-moze-pomoc-w-uksztaltowaniu-przekonania-sedziego","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/2023\/07\/11\/scj-establece-valor-probatorio-atribuible-a-las-fotocopias-pueden-ayudar-a-edificar-conviccion-del-juez\/","title":{"rendered":"SCJ ustala moc dowodow\u0105 przypisywan\u0105 fotokopiom, kt\u00f3re mog\u0105 pom\u00f3c w budowaniu przekonania s\u0119dziego\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Izba Karna Najwy\u017cszego S\u0105du Sprawiedliwo\u015bci (SCJ) potwierdzi\u0142a stanowisko, \u017ce cho\u0107 kserokopie nie stanowi\u0105 dowod\u00f3w niepodwa\u017calnych, to jednak nie ulega w\u0105tpliwo\u015bci, \u017ce ich tre\u015b\u0107 mo\u017ce pom\u00f3c s\u0119dziemu w sformu\u0142owaniu przekonania, o ile ich ocena jest poparta innymi okoliczno\u015bciami i elementami, kt\u00f3re ujawni\u0142y si\u0119 w toku post\u0119powania. <\/p>\n

W wyroku nr SCJ-SS-23-0154 z dnia 31 stycznia 2023 r. s\u0119dziowie wspomnianej izby stwierdzili, \u017ce w sprawach, w kt\u00f3rych obowi\u0105zuje swoboda dowodowa, s\u0119dzia dysponuje szerok\u0105 swobod\u0105 oceny dowod\u00f3w i wyci\u0105gania z nich wniosk\u00f3w. <\/p>\n

Je\u015bli chodzi o ocen\u0119 dowod\u00f3w, \u201cnale\u017cy stwierdzi\u0107, \u017ce Druga Izba uzna\u0142a, i\u017c w\u0142a\u015bciwym s\u0119dzi\u0105 do rozstrzygania w sprawie dowod\u00f3w zezna\u0144 jest ten, kt\u00f3ry podczas procesu realizuje zasad\u0119 bezpo\u015brednio\u015bci w odniesieniu do tych dowod\u00f3w\u201d. <\/p>\n

Orzeczenie s\u0105du zapad\u0142o po rozpatrzeniu w post\u0119powaniu kasacyjnym pozwu dotycz\u0105cego nadu\u017cycia zaufania \u2013 przest\u0119pstwa, o kt\u00f3re oskar\u017cono adwokatk\u0119 i jej matk\u0119 \u2013 w zwi\u0105zku ze sprzeda\u017c\u0105 dzia\u0142ki oraz otrzymaniem \u015brodk\u00f3w pieni\u0119\u017cnych, kt\u00f3rych nie przekazano ofierze, kt\u00f3ra zleci\u0142a sprzeda\u017c nieruchomo\u015bci. <\/p>\n

Wspomniany artyku\u0142 408 Kodeksu karnego precyzuje, \u017ce \u201cszkoda spowodowana nadu\u017cyciem zaufania musi dotyczy\u0107 w\u0142a\u015bciciela, posiadacza lub posiadacza faktycznego, kt\u00f3ry powierzy\u0142 lub przekaza\u0142 innej osobie, na podstawie jednej z okre\u015blonych um\u00f3w, rzeczy wskazane w tym przepisie prawnym, a osoba ta pozbawia go tych rzeczy, nie wywi\u0105zuj\u0105c si\u0119 z obowi\u0105zku ich zwrotu\u201d. <\/p>\n

W zwi\u0105zku z tym s\u0119dziowie Izby Karnej: Francisco Antonio Jerez Mena (przewodnicz\u0105cy), Nancy I. Salcedo Fern\u00e1ndez, Fran Euclides Soto S\u00e1nchez, Mar\u00eda G. Garabito Ram\u00edrez oraz Francisco Antonio Ortega Polanco oddalili skarg\u0119 kasacyjn\u0105 od wyroku karnego nr 216-2014, wydanego przez Izb\u0119 Karn\u0105 S\u0105du Apelacyjnego Okr\u0119gu S\u0105dowego San Pedro de Macor\u00eds w dniu 21 marca 2014 r., od kt\u00f3rego oskar\u017cone z\u0142o\u017cy\u0142y odwo\u0142anie po tym, jak zosta\u0142y skazane zar\u00f3wno w post\u0119powaniu karnym, jak i cywilnym za przedmiotowe zdarzenie. <\/p>\n

Wyrok mo\u017cna znale\u017a\u0107 pod poni\u017cszym linkiem:  https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/SCJ-SS-23-0154.pdf<\/a> <\/p>\n

\u0179r\u00f3d\u0142o<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Izba Karna Najwy\u017cszego S\u0105du Sprawiedliwo\u015bci (SCJ) podtrzyma\u0142a stanowisko, \u017ce cho\u0107 fotokopie nie stanowi\u0105 wiarygodnych dowod\u00f3w, to jednak nie mniej prawd\u0105 jest, \u017ce ich tre\u015b\u0107 mo\u017ce pom\u00f3c s\u0119dziwii w zbudowaniu jego...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11,9,10,12],"class_list":["post-2241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualidad","tag-consultores-legales","tag-firma-de-abogados-johann-newton-lopez","tag-noticias","tag-suprema-corte-de-justicia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2241\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/polski\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}