{"id":2365,"date":"2024-03-04T15:32:21","date_gmt":"2024-03-04T15:32:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/?p=39835"},"modified":"2024-03-04T15:32:21","modified_gmt":"2024-03-04T15:32:21","slug":"les-chambres-reunies-de-la-scj-etablissent-des-criteres-concernant-le-non-respect-dune-resolution-contractuelle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/2024\/03\/04\/salas-reunidas-de-la-scj-establece-criterio-sobre-incumplimiento-de-resolucion-contractual\/","title":{"rendered":"Les chambres r\u00e9unies de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice (SCJ) \u00e9tablissent des crit\u00e8res relatifs au non-respect d'une r\u00e9solution contractuelle\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Balan-scaled.jpg\" class=\"ff-og-image-inserted lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\"><\/div>\n<p>Les Chambres r\u00e9unies de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice (SCJ) estiment que lorsqu'une action en r\u00e9siliation de contrat a fait l'objet d'un proc\u00e8s et que le motif invoqu\u00e9 n'est pas retenu, la m\u00eame action peut \u00eatre intent\u00e9e \u00e0 nouveau si le d\u00e9biteur continue \u00e0 manquer \u00e0 ses obligations ou \u00e0 les ex\u00e9cuter de mani\u00e8re d\u00e9fectueuse.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Le principe jurisprudentiel figure dans l'arr\u00eat n\u00b0. <strong>SCJ-SR-23-0031 <\/strong>dat\u00e9 du 29 mai 2023, dans lequel il explique qu\u2019il appartient au tribunal de fond de d\u00e9cider si le non-paiement du prix reste constitutif d\u2019un motif de r\u00e9siliation du contrat et, dans le cadre de ses comp\u00e9tences, de d\u00e9terminer si cela est ou non valable en droit.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u201c Un raisonnement contraire serait erron\u00e9 en droit, dans la mesure o\u00f9 le contrat affect\u00e9 par le d\u00e9faut de paiement de l\u2019acheteur au titre de la prestation due entra\u00eenerait une situation de flou juridique conduisant \u00e0 la perte du droit du vendeur \u00e0 obtenir le paiement, en contrepartie de la chose vendue \u201d, indique l\u2019arr\u00eat susmentionn\u00e9.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u00c0 cet \u00e9gard, les Chambres r\u00e9unies infirment l'arr\u00eat civil n\u00b0 1303-2018-SSEN-00032, rendue le 22 janvier 2018 par la troisi\u00e8me chambre de la chambre civile et commerciale de la cour d\u2019appel du district national, et la renvoie devant la deuxi\u00e8me chambre de la chambre civile et commerciale de la cour d\u2019appel de la m\u00eame juridiction.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u201c Il ressort de la situation proc\u00e9durale expos\u00e9e ci-dessus que, m\u00eame si la Haute Cour a outrepass\u00e9 son r\u00f4le en examinant la r\u00e9ponse au-del\u00e0 des limites de sa comp\u00e9tence et de son contr\u00f4le proc\u00e9dural, nous avons proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019annulation de la d\u00e9cision contest\u00e9e, en adoptant un raisonnement qui nous est propre, fond\u00e9 sur le lien entre le principe de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e et celui de la relativit\u00e9 des conventions, tel qu\u2019il ressort de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation combin\u00e9e des articles 1108, 1184, 1304,\u00a0 1350, 1351, 1599 et 1654 du Code civil, apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 l'existence des vices invoqu\u00e9s \u00e0 l'encontre de l'arr\u00eat contest\u00e9 \u201d, explique la d\u00e9cision des Chambres r\u00e9unies.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>L'arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 rendu par les magistrats Luis Henry Molina Pe\u00f1a, Manuel R. Herrera Carbuccia, Francisco A. Jerez Mena, Fran E. Soto S\u00e1nchez, Justiniano Montero Montero, Rafael V\u00e1squez Goico, Napole\u00f3n R. Est\u00e9vez Lavandier, Mois\u00e9s A. Ferrer Landr\u00f3n, Francisco A. Ortega Polanco, Julio C\u00e9sar Can\u00f3, Etanislao Rodr\u00edguez et Arelis Ricourt.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Pour lire la d\u00e9cision dans son int\u00e9gralit\u00e9, cliquez sur le lien suivant : <a href=\"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Sent.-SCJ-SR-23-00031.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Sent.-SCJ-SR-23-00031.pdf<\/a>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/salas-reunidas-de-la-scj-establece-criterio-sobre-incumplimiento-de-resolucion-contractual\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Les Chambres r\u00e9unies de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice (SCJ) estiment que lorsqu'une action en r\u00e9siliation de contrat a d\u00e9j\u00e0 fait l'objet d'un proc\u00e8s et que le motif invoqu\u00e9 n'a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 retenu, il est possible d'intenter \u00e0 nouveau cette m\u00eame action\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11,9,10,12],"class_list":["post-2365","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualidad","tag-consultores-legales","tag-firma-de-abogados-johann-newton-lopez","tag-noticias","tag-suprema-corte-de-justicia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2365","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2365"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2365\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2365"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2365"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2365"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}