{"id":2345,"date":"2023-12-18T16:02:56","date_gmt":"2023-12-18T16:02:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/?p=39315"},"modified":"2023-12-18T16:02:56","modified_gmt":"2023-12-18T16:02:56","slug":"la-cour-supreme-de-justice-reaffirme-que-lindemnisation-pour-prejudice-subi-dans-le-domaine-immobilier-doit-etre-proportionnelle-au-prejudice-subi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/2023\/12\/18\/scj-reafirma-condena-por-danos-y-perjuicios-en-materia-inmobiliaria-debe-ser-proporcional-al-dano-sufrido\/","title":{"rendered":"La Cour supr\u00eame de justice r\u00e9affirme que l'indemnisation accord\u00e9e pour pr\u00e9judice immobilier doit \u00eatre proportionnelle au pr\u00e9judice subi\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

La troisi\u00e8me chambre de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice (SCJ) estime que, en cas de condamnation au paiement de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats devant les tribunaux immobiliers, le montant de la condamnation doit correspondre au pr\u00e9judice subi du fait de l'introduction d'une action judiciaire abusif, en fonction du litige dont est saisi le tribunal qui a rendu le jugement de condamnation. <\/p>\n

La d\u00e9cision jurisprudentielle figure dans l'arr\u00eat n\u00b0. SCJ-TS-23-0388<\/strong>, en date du 28 avril 2023, qui r\u00e9affirme que, \u201c m\u00eame si l\u2019\u00e9valuation du montant rel\u00e8ve de l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des juges du fond, l\u2019indemnisation fix\u00e9e doit \u00eatre proportionn\u00e9e au pr\u00e9judice caus\u00e9 et, par cons\u00e9quent, dans l\u2019exercice de leur pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire, les juges ne doivent pas outrepasser les limites du raisonnable et de la mod\u00e9ration \u201d. <\/p>\n

L'analyse de l'arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9, sur le point en cause, met en \u00e9vidence que le tribunal qui a rendu l\u2019arr\u00eat a fait droit \u00e0 la demande reconventionnelle en dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats et a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la partie requ\u00e9rante et ses avocats repr\u00e9sentants \u00ab parties agissant de mani\u00e8re t\u00e9m\u00e9raire \u00bb, les condamnant solidairement au paiement de $500 000,00 dollars am\u00e9ricains. <\/p>\n

L'article 31 de la loi n\u00b0 108-05 relative au registre foncier pr\u00e9voit la condamnation au paiement de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats lorsque l'action en justice a \u00e9t\u00e9 intent\u00e9e avec une l\u00e9g\u00e8ret\u00e9 r\u00e9pr\u00e9hensible ou dans le but de nuire. <\/p>\n

L'arr\u00eat de la troisi\u00e8me chambre annule partiellement le jugement n\u00b0 20190062, dat\u00e9 du 13 mars 2019, rendu par le Tribunal sup\u00e9rieur foncier du d\u00e9partement du Nord-Est, uniquement en ce qui concerne le montant des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pr\u00e9vu au sixi\u00e8me point de cet arr\u00eat, et renvoie l'affaire, ainsi d\u00e9limit\u00e9e, devant le Tribunal sup\u00e9rieur foncier du d\u00e9partement du Centre. Par ailleurs, il rejette les autres volets du pourvoi en cassation. <\/p>\n

Pour consulter l'int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de l'arr\u00eat sign\u00e9 par les magistrats Manuel Alexis Read Ortiz (pr\u00e9sident), Manuel R. Herrera Carbuccia, Mois\u00e9s A. Ferrer Landr\u00f3n, Anselmo Alejandro Bello et Rafael V\u00e1squez Goico, cliquez sur le lien suivant : https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/SCJ-TS-23-0388.pdf<\/a> <\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La troisi\u00e8me chambre de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice (SCJ) estime qu'en cas de condamnation au paiement de dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats par les tribunaux immobiliers, le montant de la condamnation doit correspondre au pr\u00e9judice subi dans le cadre de l'exercice\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11,9,10,12],"class_list":["post-2345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualidad","tag-consultores-legales","tag-firma-de-abogados-johann-newton-lopez","tag-noticias","tag-suprema-corte-de-justicia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}