{"id":1985,"date":"2022-11-08T20:47:59","date_gmt":"2022-11-08T20:47:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/?p=33513"},"modified":"2022-11-08T20:47:59","modified_gmt":"2022-11-08T20:47:59","slug":"la-cour-supreme-de-justice-scj-stipule-que-la-peine-doit-etre-proportionnelle-au-delit-commis-conforme-aux-criteres-legaux-et-fondee-sur-les-preuves-presentees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/2022\/11\/08\/scj-establece-la-pena-debe-ser-conforme-al-delito-cometido-los-parametros-legales-y-sobre-la-base-de-pruebas-aportadas\/","title":{"rendered":"La SCJ establece que la pena debe ser conforme al delito cometido, los par\u00e1metros legales y sobre la base de pruebas aportadas"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

La Chambre p\u00e9nale de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice (SCJ) a \u00e9tabli un principe jurisprudentiel selon lequel le fait de ne pas retenir une circonstance att\u00e9nuante est un pouvoir qui ne saurait \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une obligation imposable au juge.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

Par jugement <\/span>n\u00b0 SCJ-SS-22-0581<\/span><\/b> Dans une d\u00e9cision dat\u00e9e du 30 juin 2022, ladite chambre a \u00e9galement r\u00e9affirm\u00e9 son point de vue selon lequel la peine doit \u00eatre proportionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l'infraction commise, s'inscrire dans les limites l\u00e9gales et \u00eatre d\u00fbment motiv\u00e9e sur la base des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve apport\u00e9s, conform\u00e9ment aux dispositions de l'article 339 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il n\u2019existe pas la moindre circonstance att\u00e9nuante, excuse ou circonstance susceptible d\u2019\u00eatre prise en consid\u00e9ration en faveur de l\u2019accus\u00e9 afin d\u2019all\u00e9ger (mod\u00e9rer) la peine, car les circonstances des faits commis et prouv\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019encontre du requ\u00e9rant ne minimisent, ne diminuent ni ne r\u00e9duisent la gravit\u00e9 et l\u2019ampleur du crime qu\u2019il a commis et pour lequel il a \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9 et condamn\u00e9, dont il est question ici, <\/span>\u201d comme on l'a vu, de vol aggrav\u00e9 et d'utilisation d'une arme blanche \u00bb, pr\u00e9cise le jugement.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00c0 cet \u00e9gard, les juges de la deuxi\u00e8me chambre, Francisco Antonio Jerez Mena, qui la pr\u00e9side, Fran Euclides Soto S\u00e1nchez et Mar\u00eda Garabito Ram\u00edrez, ont rejet\u00e9 le pourvoi en cassation form\u00e9 contre l'arr\u00eat <\/span>n\u00b0 502-01-2021-SSEN-00045,<\/span> rendue par la troisi\u00e8me chambre p\u00e9nale de la Cour d'appel du district national, confirmant la condamnation \u00e0 cinq ans d'emprisonnement pour vol aggrav\u00e9. <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

La d\u00e9fense technique de l'accus\u00e9 demandait que soit appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 ce dernier la circonstance att\u00e9nuante pr\u00e9vue par la suspension conditionnelle de la peine, telle que d\u00e9finie \u00e0 l'article 341 de la loi, demande qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e par les juges de premi\u00e8re instance ; dans leur arr\u00eat, confirm\u00e9 par la cour, ceux-ci ont estim\u00e9 que l'imposition de la peine \u00e9tait d\u00fbment motiv\u00e9e conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l'article 339 du Code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale. <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

Pour acc\u00e9der de mani\u00e8re <\/span>int\u00e9grale<\/span> \u00e0 l'arr\u00eat, veuillez cliquer sur le lien ici.<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Source<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La Chambre p\u00e9nale de la Cour supr\u00eame de justice a \u00e9tabli le crit\u00e8re jurisprudentiel selon lequel le fait de ne pas retenir de circonstances att\u00e9nuantes pour la peine est une facult\u00e9 qui ne peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une obligation exigible du juge.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11,9,10,12],"class_list":["post-1985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualidad","tag-consultores-legales","tag-firma-de-abogados-johann-newton-lopez","tag-noticias","tag-suprema-corte-de-justicia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1985\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/francais\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}