{"id":1963,"date":"2022-10-03T17:32:00","date_gmt":"2022-10-03T17:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/?p=32576"},"modified":"2022-10-03T17:32:00","modified_gmt":"2022-10-03T17:32:00","slug":"the-scj-rules-that-administrative-judges-may-remedy-legal-deficiencies-or-errors-when-social-rights-are-violated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/2022\/10\/03\/scj-establece-jueces-zas-de-lo-contencioso-administrativo-pueden-suplir-deficiencia-o-error-juridico-cuando-sean-vulnerados-derechos-sociales\/","title":{"rendered":"SCJ establishes that judges of administrative litigation can remedy legal deficiencies or errors when social rights are violated"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-107-scaled.jpg\" class=\"ff-og-image-inserted lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\" readability=\"25.901608325449\">\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">The Third Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) ruled that administrative judges have the authority to grant public servants rights that have not been expressly requested, provided that such benefits are derived from the law, in accordance with the nature of their employment relationship and the facts of the case.&nbsp;<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">In this regard, by judgment No. <\/span><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">SCJ-TS-22-0870<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, dated August 31, 2022, the appellate court<\/span><span data-contrast=\"none\"> It allows for the correction of any legal deficiency or error in the complaint initiating proceedings in administrative law when social rights are involved.&nbsp;<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u201cThere can be no public interest embedded in the statute or derived from the contract that justifies the non-application or non-enforcement of fundamental social rights with respect to public employees, who, in reality, are in no different a situation than private-sector workers when it comes to legitimate aspirations related to their labor and which touch upon the most sensitive aspects of their human dignity,\u201d explains the ruling.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Likewise, the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice reaffirmed the principle of the protection of labor rights, established in Article 62 of the Constitution, which must be applied by the competent jurisdiction (in this case, the administrative jurisdiction) to resolve disputes arising in public-sector employment relationships.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"none\">In that regard, the aforementioned Chamber upholds <\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Judgment No. 030-1643-2022-SSEN-00004, dated January 17, 2022, issued by the Fifth Settlement Chamber of the Superior Administrative Court, refers the case to the Second Chamber of the Superior Administrative Court\u2014the lawsuit seeking employment benefits filed by a physician alleging wrongful termination.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:240}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">To read the full text of the ruling signed by Justice Manuel Alexis Read (presiding) and Justices Manuel R. Herrera Carbuccia, Mois\u00e9s A. Ferrer Landr\u00f3n, and Rafael V\u00e1squez Goico, click on the following link <a href=\"https:\/\/consultaglobal.blob.core.windows.net\/documentos\/b12970be-4478-4320-bcc3-63f631d31cc0_FCG_pr20221002.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here.&nbsp;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/poderjudicial.gob.do\/scj-establece-jueces-zas-de-lo-contencioso-administrativo-pueden-suplir-deficiencia-o-error-juridico-cuando-sean-vulnerados-derechos-sociales\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Third Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ) established that administrative court judges have the power to grant public servants rights that have not been expressly requested by them, provided that those\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[11,9,10,12],"class_list":["post-1963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualidad","tag-consultores-legales","tag-firma-de-abogados-johann-newton-lopez","tag-noticias","tag-suprema-corte-de-justicia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1963"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jnlopez.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}